|
|
#121 | |
|
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 1,719
|
Actually its not even true. Galaxy has a 560ti and GTX580 that do surround on one gpu, and there are several 590s and 295s that do single card surround. LOL at adjustable tesselation as a feature advantage compared to physx!
__________________
Rig1: intel 990X + 2 X EVGA 3GB GTX580 + 3 X Acer GD235Hz 3D Vision Surround Rig 2: intel 2500K + NVIDIA GTX590 + Dell 3007 WFPHC [SIZE="1"]NVIDIA Focus Group Member [B]NVIDIA Focus Group Members receive free software and/or hardware from NVIDIA from time to time to facilitate the evaluation of NVIDIA products. However, the opinions expressed are solely those of the Members.[/B][/SIZE] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#122 | |
|
Resident Alien
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 6,776
|
Quote:
Why laugh at tessellation level adjustments when you mentioned AO as an nvidia feature? Pot Kettle Black. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#123 |
|
Resident Alien
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 6,776
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#124 | |
|
Resident Alien
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 6,776
|
Quote:
http://www.tommti-systems.de/start.html |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#125 |
|
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 1,719
|
I've gamed a lot with 560Ti 2gb SLi @ 57 x10, a rig that is basically the performance level as a single 7970. It's fine as a budget way to do surround, but definitely tradeoffs in some games, not possible at all in others. I guess the hoped for single gpu surround didn't materialize. (at least from ATi)
__________________
Rig1: intel 990X + 2 X EVGA 3GB GTX580 + 3 X Acer GD235Hz 3D Vision Surround Rig 2: intel 2500K + NVIDIA GTX590 + Dell 3007 WFPHC [SIZE="1"]NVIDIA Focus Group Member [B]NVIDIA Focus Group Members receive free software and/or hardware from NVIDIA from time to time to facilitate the evaluation of NVIDIA products. However, the opinions expressed are solely those of the Members.[/B][/SIZE] |
|
|
|
|
|
#126 | |
|
Resident Alien
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 6,776
|
Quote:
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#127 |
|
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 1,719
|
Thanks for proving my point Roadie. How many of those benches were at the 57x10 res I mentioned? Like I said the hoped for mythical single gpu surround remains the holy grail.
__________________
Rig1: intel 990X + 2 X EVGA 3GB GTX580 + 3 X Acer GD235Hz 3D Vision Surround Rig 2: intel 2500K + NVIDIA GTX590 + Dell 3007 WFPHC [SIZE="1"]NVIDIA Focus Group Member [B]NVIDIA Focus Group Members receive free software and/or hardware from NVIDIA from time to time to facilitate the evaluation of NVIDIA products. However, the opinions expressed are solely those of the Members.[/B][/SIZE] |
|
|
|
|
|
#128 | |
|
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Australia, Sydney
Posts: 9,405
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#129 |
|
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Australia, Sydney
Posts: 9,405
|
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#130 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 3,120
|
My point was that even though ATI can do Eyefinity on a reference single GPU card and Nvidia doesn't ATM, it not playable at 5700x1200 with all the bells and whistles. In other words, you need a dual GPU system for the latest games out there. So in other words it really is a mute point about surrround needing 2 cards.
__________________
Gigabyte Z77-X UP7 | Intel 3770k | SS Phasechange | 16GB Corsair Platinum DDR3 1866 | Asus GTX680 x2 SLI | Corsair AX1200 Watt PSU | Lian-Li PC-8NWX | Intel 520 120Gb SSD x2 | Samsung S27A950D 27" 120Hz | HP ZR24w 24" S-IPS x3 Nvidia Surround @6000x1200 | Xonar Essence STX |
|
|
|
|
|
#131 | |
|
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 1,719
|
Quote:
__________________
Rig1: intel 990X + 2 X EVGA 3GB GTX580 + 3 X Acer GD235Hz 3D Vision Surround Rig 2: intel 2500K + NVIDIA GTX590 + Dell 3007 WFPHC [SIZE="1"]NVIDIA Focus Group Member [B]NVIDIA Focus Group Members receive free software and/or hardware from NVIDIA from time to time to facilitate the evaluation of NVIDIA products. However, the opinions expressed are solely those of the Members.[/B][/SIZE] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#132 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 1,526
|
Quote:
Actually if you read the whole article at hard OCP, you'd see that a single HD7970 actually does the holy grail of 5760*1080 at playable frame rates in a fair amount of games, while the GTX 580 was playing at the lower settings You see in those graphs, and the reason for those graphs are to compare all 3 cards at the same settings, and nothing else. Basically, it's not because a single HD7970 can't do better in 3 monitor mode... ![]() |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|