nV News Deals Shop Archive Search Files Forum Feed Articles IRC Chat GeForce.com


Search Site
Ads by Google
Links To NVIDIA
Drivers
Products
Communities
Support
NVIDIA Blog
News Room
About NVIDIA
GeForce Technology
CUDA
DirectX 11
Optimus
PhysX
SLI
3D Vision
3D Vision Surround
Articles
GeForce GTX 580
GeForce GTX 570
GeForce GTX 560 Ti
GeForce GTX 480
GeForce GTX 465
GeForce GTX 460
GeForce GTS 450
GeForce GTX 295
GeForce GTX 280
GeForce GTX 260
GeForce GT 240
GeForce 9800 GTX
GeForce 9800 GX2
GeForce 9600 GT
GeForce 8800 Ultra
GeForce 8800 GTX
GeForce 8800 GTS
GeForce 8800 GT
GeForce 8600 GTS
GeForce 8500 GT
GeForce 7950 GX2
GeForce 7950 GT
GeForce 7900 GTX
GeForce 7900 GS
GeForce 7800 GTX
Watercooling Project
My Book 500GB
Raptor Hard Drive
Guide To Doom 3
EVGA Stuff
EVGA E-LEET
EVGA Precision
GPU Voltage Tuner
OC Scanner
SLI Enhancement
EVGA Bot
EVGA Gear
Reviews and Awards
Associates
Benchmark Reviews
Fraps
GeForce Italia
GPU Review
Hardware Pacers
LaptopVideo2Go
MVKTECH
News3D (NVITALIA)
OutoftheBoxMods
OSNN.net
Overclocker Cafe
PC Extreme
PC Gaming Standards
PhysX Links & Info
TestSeek
3DChip (German)
8Dimensional
MSI GeForce 8500 GT and 8600 GT Comparison - Page 6 of 8

LOST PLANET: EXTREME CONDITION PERFORMANCE

Performance in Lost Planet was determined by executing the built-in performance test. The DirectX 9 version of the demo was utilized as the tests were generated in a Windows XP environment. The Lost Planet performance test performs a rolling demo that contains two scenes within two different environments. Snow, occurs in an outdoors setting and Cave occurs indoors.

Lost Planet Settings

Lost Planet's auto-detect provided almost identical results between the MSI 8600 GT OC and the 8500 GT. The only difference was the Motion Blur Quality setting which was auto-set to low on the 8600 GT. This setting was toggled to none for uniform testing between both cards.

Lost Planet Cave Performance Results - 800x600

Lost Planet Cave Performance Results - 1024x768

Increasing the resolution from 800x600 to 1024x768 had a marked effect on the 8500 GT's performance. The 8600 GT OC suffers the same fate, albeit at a higher resolution. Increasing the antialiasing and anisotropic filtering levels had little effect on the 8600 GT OC, but knocked a few frames per second off of the 8500 GT.

Lost Planet Snow Performance Results - 800x600

Lost Planet Snow Performance Results - 1024x768

The snow portion of the benchmark had larger results variation than the cave portion. Antialising and anisotropic filtering levels have a much bigger effect on the performance levels of the 8600 GT OC. At 800x600, the 8600 GT OC is back to doubling the performance of the 8500 GT. The 8500 GT is just scraping by at 800x600, and can't handle 1024x768.

Next Page: Counter-Strike: Source Performance

Last Updated on July 13, 2007


Table of Contents

Advertisement

nV News - Copyright © 1998-2014.
Search Products
Search
for


Ads by Casale
Tweaks
Metro: Last Light
PlanetSide 2
Miscellaneous Links
AutoDesk 123 Design
Build Your Gaming PC
FPS vs. Frame Time
Free Games And MMOs
GeForce SLI Technology
HPC For Dummies
PC Game Release Dates
Play Classic PC Games
Steam Hardware Survey
Video Game Designers
TechTerms Dictionary
GPU Applications
AMD GPU Clock Tool
AMD System Monitor
ATITool
aTuner
EVGA E-LEET
EVGA OC Scanner
EVGA Precision
EVGA Voltage Tuner
Gainward ExperTool
GPU-Shark
GPU Voltage Tuner
Fraps
FurMark
GLview
GPU Caps Viewer
GPU PerfStudio
GPU Shark
GPU-Z
MSI Afterburner
nHancer
NiBiTor
NVClock (Linux)
NVFlash
NVIDIA Inspector
NvTempLogger
NVTray
PowerStrip
RivaTuner
SLI Profile Tool
The Compressonator
3DCenter Filter Test
3DMark 11
3DMark Vantage
PhysX Applications
Cell Factor Revolution
Cryostatis Tech Demo
Cube Wall Demo
PhysX FluidMark
Fluid Physics
NV PhysX Tweaker
NVIDIA OPTIX 2
PhysX Downloads
PhysX at YouTube
Add-In Partners
AFOX
ASUS
AXLE
BFG Technologies
BIOSTAR
Chaintech
Colorful
ELSA
emTek
EVGA
GAINWARD
GALAXY
GIGABYTE
FORSA
FOXCONN
Inno3D
Jaton
Leadtek
Manli
MSI
Palit
PNY
Point of View
Prolink
SPARKLE
XFX
ZOGIS
ZOTAC